menu ☰
menu ˟

Environmental risk factors of pregnancy outcomes: a summary of recent meta-analyses of epidemiological studies

15 Jan 2013

Background:
Various epidemiological studies have suggested associations between environmental exposures and pregnancy outcomes. Some studies have tempted to combine information from various epidemiological studies using meta-analysis. We aimed to describe the methodologies used in these recent meta-analyses of environmental exposures and pregnancy outcomes. Furthermore, we aimed to report their main findings.
Methods:
We conducted a bibliographic search with relevant search terms. We obtained and evaluated 16 recent meta-analyses.
Results:
The number of studies included in each reported meta-analysis varied greatly, with the largest number of studies available for environmental tobacco smoke. Only a small number of the studies reported having followed meta-analysis guidelines or having used a quality rating system. Generally they tested for heterogeneity and publication bias. Analysis of heterogeneity was reported on in a number of the studies. Publication bias did not occur frequently.The meta-analyses found statistically significant negative associations between environmental tobacco smoke and stillbirth, birth weight and any congenital anomalies; PM2.5 and preterm birth; outdoor air pollution and some congenital anomalies; indoor air pollution from solid fuel use and stillbirth and birth weight; polychlorinated biphenyls (PCB) exposure and birth weight; disinfection by-products in water and stillbirth, small for gestational age and some congenital anomalies; occupational exposure to pesticides and solvents and some congenital anomalies; and agent orange and some congenital anomalies.
Conclusions:
The number of meta-analyses of environmental exposures and pregnancy outcomes is small and varied in methodology. They reported statistically significant associations between environmental exposures such as environmental tobacco smoke, air pollution and chemicals and pregnancy outcomes.

Date: 
15 January 2013

Click here to view the full article which appeared in Environmental Health

IPH Logo